Westpoint Ultra Fast Power Bank WP-1100
In stock
| Specification | Details |
|---|---|
| Model | WP-1100 |
| Input (USB-C) | 5V-2.4A, 9V-2A (18W) |
| Material | ABS |
| Output (USB-C) | 5V-2.4A, 9V-2.22A, 12V-1.67A (PD35W) |
| Capacity | 10000mAh / 3.7V / 37Wh |
| Product Dimension | 105 × 65 × 15 mm |
| Weight | 190g ± 20g |
| Charging Time | ~1H |
WestPoint Wireless Headphone WP-200
In stock
| Specification | Details |
|---|---|
| Model | WP-200 |
| USB Port | Type-C |
| Noise Cancellation | -23±2dB |
| Wireless Range | 10-15M (without obstacles) |
| Bluetooth Version | V5.3 |
| Profiles Supported | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Battery Capacity | 400mAh |
| Speaker Size | 40mm |
| Play Time | 36H (BT) – 100% volume / 25H (ANC+BT) – 100% volume |
| Speaker Impedance | 32Ω±10% |
| Talk Time | 25H |
| Sensitivity | 117±3dB |
| Charging Time | 2H |
| Max Power Input | DC 5V/1A |
WestPoint Wireless Neckband WP-150
In stock
Specification:
1. Chipset: JL
2. Cable : TPE
3. Speaker: real copper ring/ 6 μ
4. Working range: 8m
5. Material: ABS
6. Bluetooth version:EDR 5.0
7. Driver size:10mm
8. Impedance: 18Ω±10%
9. Frequency response:20-20KHz
10. Sensitivity: 102±3dB
11. Battery capacity:200mA
12.Playing time:10H
WestPoint Wireless Neckband WP-155
In stock
| Specifications | Details |
|---|---|
| Chipset | JL |
| Cable | TPE |
| Speaker | Real copper ring/6 μ |
| Working range | 8m |
| Material | ABS |
| Line length | 23cm ± 10% |
| Bluetooth version | EDR 5.0 |
| Driver size | 10mm |
| Impedance | 18Ω ± 10% |
| Frequency response | 20-20KHz |
| Sensitivity | 102±3dB |
| Battery capacity | 200mA |
| Playing time | 10H |
| Standby time | 300H |
| Charging time | 1.5-2H |
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.